All Grants to Grey by Month


Ad Hoc grants to Grey

Ad Hoc grants to Other Electorates

Demographics

2019 2022 Change Direction
63 60
Rowan Ramsey
Rowan Ramsey
-3 Grey

Grey is a SAFE, Rural SA seat with a privilege score at the 34 %ile, held by Rowan Ramsey for LIBS with 63% of the Vote

Age distribution within Grey

Under 1818-3435-4950-6465-7980+
22% 19% 18% 22% 15% 5%

Socio-Economic Data for Grey

104
47
56
68
40
39
27
20
10
1
Decile 1 Decile 2 Decile 3 Decile 4 Decile 5 Decile 6 Decile 7 Decile 8 Decile 9 Decile 10

This data represents the ABS data from the 2016 census for the Index of Economic Resources. 'The IER summarises variables relating to the financial aspects of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. These include indicators of high and low income, as well as variables that correlate with high or low wealth. Areas with higher scores have relatively greater access to economic resources than areas with lower scores.' SEIFA Technical Paper

Census data is used to distributed neighbourhoods into bands (deciles) ranging from the poorest in Decile 1 to the wealthiest in Decile 10. The higher the number and column, the more neighbourhoods are in that decile.

The shape of the columns shows which way the electorate skews in wealth.

ABMINGA STATION
AGERY
ALFORD
ALLANDALE STATION
ALMA
ALPANA
ALTON DOWNS STATION
AMYTON
ANAMA
ANDAMOOKA
ANDREWS
ANGEPENA
APOINGA
APPILA
ARCOONA
ARDROSSAN
ARKAROOLA VILLAGE
ARMAGH
ARNO BAY
ARTHURTON
AUBURN
AUSTRALIA PLAINS
AVON
BACKY POINT
BAIRD BAY
BALAH
BALAKLAVA
BALGOWAN
BANGOR
BARABBA
BARATTA
BARNA
BARNDIOOTA
BAROOTA
BARUNGA GAP
BEAUFORT
BEETALOO VALLEY
BELALIE EAST
BLANCHE HARBOR
BLUFF BEACH
BLYTH
BOCKELBERG
BOLLARDS LAGOON
BON BON
BOOKABIE
BOOLEROO CENTRE
BOONERDO
BOORS PLAIN
BOSTON
BRADY CREEK
BRAMFIELD
BRUCE
BUNGAMA
BUTE
BUTLER
CALTOWIE
CAMPOONA
CANOWIE
CANOWIE BELT
CARAWA
CARRIEWERLOO
CAVENAGH
CHILPENUNDA
CLINTON
COCATA
COCKALEECHIE
COLLINSVILLE
COOBOWIE
COOK
COOTRA
COUCH BEACH
COWELL
COWLEDS LANDING
CROWN POINT
CURRAMULKA
DARKE PEAK
EDILILLIE
EMEROO
FARRELL FLAT
FISCHER
FISHERMAN BAY
FRANKLYN
GEORGETOWN
GILES CORNER
GLADSTONE
GULNARE
HILLTOWN
HILTABA
HONITON
IRON BARON
KAINTON
KAPINNIE
KIRTON POINT
KOOLGERA
KYANCUTTA
LEASINGHAM
LINWOOD
LOCHIEL
MAGDALA
MANOORA
MARLA
MELROSE
MINTARO
MORN HILL
MULLAQUANA
NAVAN
NORTH BEACH
OLYMPIC DAM
PANEY
PORT GILES
PORT NEILL
PORT VINCENT
REDHILL
WILMINGTON
YACKA
YANINEE
YONGALA

About

Grants can be filtered within each electorate by confidentiality contract (larger screens only) or selection process (all devices). Click on the icons to filter grants. Mouse over icons or links for details.

Members get access to all grants data and all analysis. Guests get access to grant data except the most recent three months. Grant data will be updated regularly while funding continues for this work.

Full details for each grant can be found by clicking on the publication date which links to the government version.

Commonwealth Grants are awarded according to one of the following processes:

Grants can be advertised according to one of the above selection processes but this process can be over-ridden by Ministers or Cabinet. Since Jan 2018 over 130,000 individual grants across over 1,900 programs have been made. A minority of grants are awarded in an Ad Hoc manner.

The Australia Institute, which analysed grants across a small number of programs (2021), found that Ministerial Discretion had been biased toward marginal Liberal seats and has this to say about Ad Hoc grants.

The Commonwealth Grants Rules and Guidelines (CGRG) permits the allocation of grants in certain exigencies: A one-off or ad hoc grant generally does not involve planned selection processes, but is instead designed to meet a specific need, often due to urgency or other circumstances. These grants are generally not available to a range of potential grantees or on an ongoing basis.

In the cases considered, promises made in an election campaign have been construed as circumstances that warrant an invitation only grants process rather than a planned, competitive selection process. This seems prima facie at odds with the CGRG, which require grant administrators to consider seven key principles:

The Australian Govt Soliciter summarises requirements for Ministers of the Commonwealth in awarding grants: