All Grants to Durack by Month


Ad Hoc grants to Durack

Ad Hoc grants to Other Electorates

Demographics

2019 2022 Change Direction
65 54
Melissa Price
Melissa Price
-11 Durack

Durack is a SAFE, Rural WA seat with a privilege score at the 42 %ile, held by Melissa Price for LIBS with 65% of the Vote

Age distribution within Durack

Under 1818-3435-4950-6465-7980+
25% 24% 22% 19% 8% 2%

Socio-Economic Data for Durack

101
50
48
58
49
41
50
44
24
16
Decile 1 Decile 2 Decile 3 Decile 4 Decile 5 Decile 6 Decile 7 Decile 8 Decile 9 Decile 10

This data represents the ABS data from the 2016 census for the Index of Economic Resources. 'The IER summarises variables relating to the financial aspects of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage. These include indicators of high and low income, as well as variables that correlate with high or low wealth. Areas with higher scores have relatively greater access to economic resources than areas with lower scores.' SEIFA Technical Paper

Census data is used to distributed neighbourhoods into bands (deciles) ranging from the poorest in Decile 1 to the wealthiest in Decile 10. The higher the number and column, the more neighbourhoods are in that decile.

The shape of the columns shows which way the electorate skews in wealth.

AJANA
ALLANOOKA
ALMA
AMBANIA
ANGELO RIVER
ANTONYMYRE
ARDATH
ARRINO
BAANDEE
BABAKIN
BABBAGE ISLAND
BADGERIN ROCK
BADGINGARRA
BADJALING
BALLIDU
BARBALIN
BARBERTON
BARROW ISLAND
BEACHLANDS
BEACON
BENCUBBIN
BENJABERRING
BILINGURR
BINDI BINDI
BODALLIN
BOLGART
BOODARIE
BOODAROCKIN
BOWGADA
BRUCE ROCK
BULLFINCH
BUNDANOON
BUNGULLA
BUNJIL
BUNTINE
BURAKIN
BURRACOPPIN
BURRAN ROCK
CABLE BEACH
CADOUX
CALINGIRI
CAMBALLIN
CAMBRIDGE GULF
CANE
CANNA
CAPE RANGE NATIONAL PARK
CARNAMAH
CATABY
CERVANTES
CHICHESTER
COCKATOO ISLAND
COOLADAR HILL
COOMBERDALE
COOROW
CORINTHIA
COSSACK
COWCOWING
CRAMPHORNE
CUE
CUNDERDIN
DALWALLINU
DAMPIER
DENHAM
DEVILS CREEK
DOODLAKINE
DOONGIN
DOWERIN
DRYSDALE RIVER
DULYALBIN
EAST DAMBORING
EAST LYONS RIVER
EMU HILL
ENEABBA
FITZROY CROSSING
FORTESCUE
GABBIN
GERALDTON
GLENTROMIE
GOODLANDS
GOOMALLING
GOOMARIN
GREEN HEAD
GREENWOODS VALLEY
GUNYIDI
HALLS CREEK
HINDMARSH
HINES HILL
INDEE
JIBBERDING
JURIEN BAY
KALBARRI
KONDUT
KONNONGORRING
KOOLAN ISLAND
KOOLYANOBBING
KULJA
KUNUNOPPIN
KWOLYIN
LAKE CARNEGIE
LATHAM
MANMANNING
MARBLE BAR
MAYA
MERKANOOKA
MILING
MOGUMBER
MOUNT HILL
NANGEENAN
NEWMAN
NORTH TRAYNING
NORTH WIALKI
NORTH YELBENI
NUKARNI
NULLAGINE
PANTAPIN
PARABURDOO
PIAWANING
PINDAR
ROEBOURNE
SANDSTONE
SHACKLETON
SOUTH KUMMININ
SOUTH MURCHISON
TARDUN
TELFER
THEVENARD ISLAND
WALGOOLAN
YERECOIN

About

Grants can be filtered within each electorate by confidentiality contract (larger screens only) or selection process (all devices). Click on the icons to filter grants. Mouse over icons or links for details.

Members get access to all grants data and all analysis. Guests get access to grant data except the most recent three months. Grant data will be updated regularly while funding continues for this work.

Full details for each grant can be found by clicking on the publication date which links to the government version.

Commonwealth Grants are awarded according to one of the following processes:

Grants can be advertised according to one of the above selection processes but this process can be over-ridden by Ministers or Cabinet. Since Jan 2018 over 130,000 individual grants across over 1,900 programs have been made. A minority of grants are awarded in an Ad Hoc manner.

The Australia Institute, which analysed grants across a small number of programs (2021), found that Ministerial Discretion had been biased toward marginal Liberal seats and has this to say about Ad Hoc grants.

The Commonwealth Grants Rules and Guidelines (CGRG) permits the allocation of grants in certain exigencies: A one-off or ad hoc grant generally does not involve planned selection processes, but is instead designed to meet a specific need, often due to urgency or other circumstances. These grants are generally not available to a range of potential grantees or on an ongoing basis.

In the cases considered, promises made in an election campaign have been construed as circumstances that warrant an invitation only grants process rather than a planned, competitive selection process. This seems prima facie at odds with the CGRG, which require grant administrators to consider seven key principles:

The Australian Govt Soliciter summarises requirements for Ministers of the Commonwealth in awarding grants: