Adelaide
ALP
Steve Georganas
Aston
LIBS
Alan Tudge
Ballarat
ALP
Catherine King
Banks
LIBS
David Coleman
Barker
LIBS
Tony Pasin
Barton
ALP
Linda Burney
Bass
LIBS
Bridget Archer
Bean
ALP
David Smith
Bendigo
ALP
Lisa Chesters
Bennelong
ALP
Jerome Laxale
Berowra
LIBS
Julian Leeser
Blair
ALP
Shayne Neumann
Blaxland
ALP
Jason Clare
Bonner
LIBS
Ross Vasta
Boothby
ALP
Nicolle Flint
Bowman
LIBS
Henry Pike
Bradfield
LIBS
Paul Fletcher
Brand
ALP
Madeleine King
Brisbane
GREENS
Stephen Bates
Bruce
ALP
Julian Hill
Burt
ALP
Matt Keogh
Calare
NATS
Andrew Gee
Calwell
ALP
Maria Vamvakinou
Canberra
ALP
Alicia Payne
Canning
LIBS
Andrew Hastie
Capricornia
LIBS
Michelle Landry
Casey
ALP
Aaron Violi
Chifley
ALP
Ed Husic
Chisholm
ALP
Gladys Liu
Clark
IND
Andrew Wilkie
Cook
LIBS
Scott Morrison
Cooper
ALP
Ged Kearney
Corangamite
ALP
Libby Coker
Corio
ALP
Richard Marles
Cowan
ALP
Anne Aly
Cowper
NATS
Pat Conaghan
Cunningham
ALP
Alison Byrnes
Curtin
IND
Kate Chaney
Dawson
LIBS
Andrew Willcox
Deakin
LIBS
Michael Sukkar
Dickson
LIBS
Peter Dutton
Dobell
ALP
Emma McBride
Dunkley
ALP
Peta Murphy
Durack
LIBS
Melissa Price
Eden-Monaro
ALP
Kristy McBain
Fadden
LIBS
Stuart Robert
Fairfax
LIBS
Ted O'Brien
Farrer
LIBS
Sussan Ley
Fenner
ALP
Andrew Leigh
Fisher
LIBS
Andrew Wallace
Flinders
LIBS
Zoe McKenzie
Flynn
LIBS
Colin Boyce
Forde
LIBS
Bert van Manen
Forrest
LIBS
Nola Marino
Fowler
IND
Dai Le
Franklin
ALP
Julie Collins
Gellibrand
ALP
Tim Watts
Gilmore
ALP
Fiona Phillips
Gippsland
NATS
Darren Chester
Goldstein
IND
Zoe Daniel
Gorton
ALP
Brendan O'Connor
Grayndler
ALP
Anthony Albanese
Greenway
ALP
Michelle Rowland
Grey
LIBS
Rowan Ramsey
Griffith
GREENS
Max Chandler-Mather
Hasluck
ALP
Tanya Lawrence
Herbert
LIBS
Phillip Thompson
Higgins
ALP
Michelle Ananda-Rajah
Hindmarsh
ALP
Mark Butler
Hinkler
LIBS
Keith Pitt
Holt
ALP
Cassandra Fernando
Hotham
ALP
Clare O'Neil
Hughes
LIBS
Jenny Ware
Hume
LIBS
Angus Taylor
Hunter
ALP
Dan Repacholi
Indi
IND
Helen Haines
Isaacs
ALP
Mark Dreyfus
Jagajaga
ALP
Kate Thwaites
Kennedy
KAP
Bob Katter
Kingsford Smith
ALP
Matt Thistlethwaite
Kingston
ALP
Amanda Rishworth
Kooyong
IND
Monique Ryan
La Trobe
LIBS
Jason Wood
Lalor
ALP
Joanne Ryan
Leichhardt
LIBS
Warren Entsch
Lilley
ALP
Anika Wells
Lindsay
LIBS
Melissa McIntosh
Lingiari
ALP
Marion Scrymgour
Lyne
NATS
David Gillespie
Lyons
ALP
Brian Mitchell
Macarthur
ALP
Mike Freelander
Mackellar
IND
Sophie Scamps
Macnamara
ALP
Josh Burns
Macquarie
ALP
Susan Templeman
Makin
ALP
Tony Zappia
Mallee
NATS
Anne Webster
Maranoa
LIBS
David Littleproud
Maribyrnong
ALP
Bill Shorten
McEwen
ALP
Rob Mitchell
McMahon
ALP
Chris Bowen
McPherson
LIBS
Karen Andrews
Melbourne
GREENS
Adam Bandt
Menzies
LIBS
Keith Wolahan
Mitchell
LIBS
Alex Hawke
Monash
LIBS
Russell Broadbent
Moncrieff
LIBS
Angie Bell
Moore
LIBS
Ian Goodenough
Moreton
ALP
Graham Perrett
New England
NATS
Barnaby Joyce
Newcastle
ALP
Sharon Claydon
Nicholls
NATS
Sam Birrell
North Sydney
IND
Kylea Tink
O'Connor
LIBS
Rick Wilson
Oxley
ALP
Milton Dick
Page
NATS
Kevin Hogan
Parkes
NATS
Mark Coulton
Parramatta
ALP
Andrew Charlton
Paterson
ALP
Meryl Swanson
Pearce
ALP
Tracey Roberts
Petrie
LIBS
Luke Howarth
Rankin
ALP
Jim Chalmers
Reid
ALP
Sally Sitou
Richmond
ALP
Justine Elliot
Riverina
NATS
Michael McCormack
Robertson
ALP
Gordon Reid
Ryan
GREENS
Elizabeth Watson-Brown
Scullin
ALP
Andrew Giles
Shortland
ALP
Pat Conroy
Solomon
ALP
Luke Gosling
Spence
ALP
Matt Burnell
Sturt
LIBS
James Stevens
Swan
ALP
Zaneta Mascarenhas
Sydney
ALP
Tanya Plibersek
Tangney
ALP
Sam Lim
Wannon
LIBS
Dan Tehan
Warringah
IND
Zali Steggall
Watson
ALP
Tony Burke
Werriwa
ALP
Anne Stanley
Whitlam
ALP
Stephen Jones
Wide Bay
LIBs
Llew O'Brien
Wills
ALP
Peter Khalil
Wright
LIBS
Scott Buchholz
Wentworth
IND
Allegra Spender
Mayo
CA
Rebekha Sharkie
Perth
ALP
Patrick Gorman
Longman
LIBS
Terry Young
Fremantle
ALP
Josh Wilson
Braddon
LIBS
Gavin Pearce
Groom
LIBS
Garth Hamilton
Fraser
ALP
Daniel Mulino

Find out about Membership or check your customer record.

Seats that changed parties

20192022ChangeDirectionElectorate
64 51
Celia Hammond
Kate Chaney
-13 Curtin
64 52
Chris Hayes
Dai Le
-12 Fowler
63 52
Jason Falinski
Sophie Scamps
-11 Mackellar
61 52
Ben Morton
Sam Lim
-9 Tangney
57 51
John Alexander
Jerome Laxale
-6 Bennelong
62 56
Michelle Landry
Michelle Landry
-6 Capricornia
59 53
Ken O'Dowd
Colin Boyce
-6 Flynn
59 53
Trent Zimmerman
Kylea Tink
-6 North Sydney
58 53
Tim Wilson
Zoe Daniel
-5 Goldstein
60 56
Andrew Laming
Henry Pike
-4 Bowman
55 51
Tony Smith
Aaron Violi
-4 Casey
65 61
George Christensen
Andrew Willcox
-4 Dawson
63 59
Ted O'Brien
Ted O'Brien
-4 Fairfax
63 59
Andrew Wallace
Andrew Wallace
-4 Fisher
59 55
Bert van Manen
Bert van Manen
-4 Forde
65 61
Keith Pitt
Keith Pitt
-4 Hinkler
65 61
Angie Bell
Angie Bell
-4 Moncrieff
56 52
Julian Simmonds
Elizabeth Watson-Brown
-4 Ryan
65 61
Scott Buchholz
Scott Buchholz
-4 Wright
57 54
Ross Vasta
Ross Vasta
-3 Bonner
55 52
Peter Dutton
Peter Dutton
-3 Dickson
64 61
Stuart Robert
Stuart Robert
-3 Fadden
56 53
Josh Frydenberg
Monique Ryan
-3 Kooyong
58 55
Luke Howarth
Luke Howarth
-3 Petrie
54 52
Katie Allen
Michelle Ananda-Rajah
-2 Higgins
62 60
Karen Andrews
Karen Andrews
-2 McPherson
54 52
Lucy Wicks
Gordon Reid
-2 Robertson
54 53
Warren Entsch
Warren Entsch
-1 Leichhardt
63 62
Llew O'Brien
Llew O'Brien
-1 Wide Bay
55 55
Ken Wyatt
Tanya Lawrence
0 Hasluck
72 72
David Littleproud
David Littleproud
0 Maranoa
53 53
Terry Young
Terry Young
0 Longman
55 56
Trevor Evans
Stephen Bates
1 Brisbane
58 59
Christian Porter
Tracey Roberts
1 Pearce
51 53
Louise Miller-Frost
Nicolle Flint
2 Boothby
53 55
Fiona Martin
Sally Sitou
2 Reid
51 54
Dave Sharma
Allegra Spender
3 Wentworth
67 70
John McVeigh
Garth Hamilton
3 Groom
58 62
Phillip Thompson
Phillip Thompson
4 Herbert
51 56
Carina Garland
Gladys Liu
5 Chisholm
53 59
Steve Irons
Zaneta Mascarenhas
6 Swan
53 60
Terri Butler
Max Chandler-Mather
7 Griffith

Seats that became more marginal

20192019ChangeDirectionElectorate
70 55
Damian Drum
Sam Birrell
-15 Nicholls
64 51
Celia Hammond
Kate Chaney
-13 Curtin
64 52
Chris Hayes
Dai Le
-12 Fowler
72 60
Adam Bandt
Adam Bandt
-12 Melbourne
67 56
Paul Fletcher
Paul Fletcher
-11 Bradfield
65 54
Melissa Price
Melissa Price
-11 Durack
63 52
Jason Falinski
Sophie Scamps
-11 Mackellar
62 51
Ian Goodenough
Ian Goodenough
-11 Moore
65 55
Nola Marino
Nola Marino
-10 Forrest
61 52
Ben Morton
Sam Lim
-9 Tangney
62 54
Andrew Hastie
Andrew Hastie
-8 Canning
69 61
Alex Hawke
Alex Hawke
-8 Mitchell
60 53
Alan Tudge
Alan Tudge
-7 Aston
64 57
Julian Hill
Julian Hill
-7 Bruce
69 62
Maria Vamvakinou
Maria Vamvakinou
-7 Calwell
58 51
Kevin Andrews
Keith Wolahan
-7 Menzies
64 57
Rick Wilson
Rick Wilson
-7 O'Connor
72 65
Andrew Giles
Andrew Giles
-7 Scullin
57 51
John Alexander
Jerome Laxale
-6 Bennelong
62 56
Michelle Landry
Michelle Landry
-6 Capricornia
69 63
Scott Morrison
Scott Morrison
-6 Cook
59 53
Ken O'Dowd
Colin Boyce
-6 Flynn
59 53
Trent Zimmerman
Kylea Tink
-6 North Sydney
57 51
James Stevens
James Stevens
-6 Sturt
66 61
Julian Leeser
Julian Leeser
-5 Berowra
67 62
Alicia Payne
Alicia Payne
-5 Canberra
65 60
Ged Kearney
Ged Kearney
-5 Cooper
55 50
Michael Sukkar
Michael Sukkar
-5 Deakin
58 53
Tim Wilson
Zoe Daniel
-5 Goldstein
65 60
Brendan O'Connor
Brendan O'Connor
-5 Gorton
63 58
Angus Taylor
Angus Taylor
-5 Hume

Seats that became safer

20192019ChangeDirectionElectorate
57 67
Madeleine King
Madeleine King
10 Brand
55 65
Matt Keogh
Matt Keogh
10 Burt
55 65
Patrick Gorman
Patrick Gorman
10 Perth
57 67
Josh Wilson
Josh Wilson
10 Fremantle
51 60
Anne Aly
Anne Aly
9 Cowan
56 65
Clare O'Neil
Clare O'Neil
9 Hotham
51 60
Anika Wells
Anika Wells
9 Lilley
53 61
Michelle Rowland
Michelle Rowland
8 Greenway
51 59
Helen Haines
Helen Haines
8 Indi
50 58
Susan Templeman
Susan Templeman
8 Macquarie
55 63
Rebekha Sharkie
Rebekha Sharkie
8 Mayo
51 58
Libby Coker
Libby Coker
7 Corangamite
51 58
Mike Kelly
Kristy McBain
7 Eden-Monaro
53 60
Terri Butler
Max Chandler-Mather
7 Griffith
52 59
Graham Perrett
Graham Perrett
7 Moreton
59 65
Linda Burney
Linda Burney
6 Barton
61 67
Sussan Ley
Sussan Ley
6 Farrer
59 65
Matt Thistlethwaite
Matt Thistlethwaite
6 Kingsford Smith
56 62
Josh Burns
Josh Burns
6 Macnamara
56 62
Milton Dick
Milton Dick
6 Oxley
53 59
Luke Gosling
Luke Gosling
6 Solomon
53 59
Steve Irons
Zaneta Mascarenhas
6 Swan
58 63
David Smith
David Smith
5 Bean
51 56
Carina Garland
Gladys Liu
5 Chisholm
57 62
Kate Thwaites
Kate Thwaites
5 Jagajaga
54 59
Jason Wood
Jason Wood
5 La Trobe
53 58
Gavin Pearce
Gavin Pearce
5 Braddon

Search

RELIGION
[8] ACCOUNTABILITY
[7] INFLUENCE
[5] PRIVACY
[4] DEMOCRACY
[4] CHARITIES
[3] CENSUS
[3] THINKTANKS
[3] WORKER RIGHTS
[2] MEDIA BIAS
[8] ACCOUNTABILITY
[7] INFLUENCE
[5] PRIVACY
[4] DEMOCRACY
[4] CHARITIES
[3] CENSUS
[3] THINKTANKS
[3] WORKER RIGHTS
[2] MEDIA BIAS

Of Death And Taxes
Rosie Williams, BA (Sociology)
The adage that there are only two things certain in life: death and taxes has never applied to religious charities but new registration requirements mean those enjoying the greatest tax breaks face an uncertain future.

Since Governor Burke funded the construction of churches with The Church Act in 1836, religion in Australia has enjoyed historical privilege in the form of land grants, government subsidies and generous tax concessions. However, recent changes in the regulation and administration of charities has seen Australia's religious charities claim to be at risk of losing those tax concessions and with them, their capacity to survive as financial entities.

Despite the leading role in relief of poverty now being the responsibility of and funded by the secular state, religious charities have enjoyed the privileges established for them prior to the emergence of the welfare state and have continued to benefit financially through funding for employment, aged care and similar programs. The long history of land gifts for which they have never been taxed, income tax exemptions, deductible gift recipient status and more recently, fringe-benefits exemptions have enabled the churches in Australia to amass untold wealth.

The economic depressions of 1890s and 1920s saw the existing charity system struggle under the weight of the need with which it was faced. Upon the establishment of welfare during the war era, supporting the poor became a responsiblity of the state through which religious organisations continue to play a major role.

Making religious charities fully transparent to the secular state that funds so much of their work has proven notoriously difficult. A majority of charities are religious organisations who still enjoy full tax exemption despite repeated attempts to remove this historical privilege and the establishment of an industry specific regulator, the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profit Commission, in 2012.

The historical privileges have built the wealth and their role in benevolent works has provided the social licence for churches to influence public policy. The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, followed by the same-sex marriage plebiscite and more recently, the case against Cardinal George Pell has cooled public sentiment toward the privileges enjoyed by our religious institution, putting their social licence at risk.

It is when one considers the impact of religious belief on same-sex marriage in aged care, health care issues such as the recently passed Voluntary Assisted Dying legislation or abortion that it becomes obvious that while the churches have historically played a significant role in meeting basic human needs, in an increasingly secularised society this role is coming under question, particularly when these same organisations are only operating through their dependence on generous tax concessions which are not available to secular or for-profit organisations.

Thanks to the establishment of the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profit Commission and the reporting it requires, we now know that Australian charities maintain over $300 billion in assets annually. A large factor in this are that universities, schools, hospitals and aged care facilities are all registered charities. However, it is also the case that historical gifts of land, funding and tax concessions have concentrated enormous wealth in the hands of religious organisations and that religious charities dominate the government funded charities that continue to deliver government social and educational functions.

It must also be noted that the current legislation excludes many religious organisations from reporting requirements so the true wealth of the charity sector and within it, the wealth of Australian churches remains shrouded in mystery.

Charities declaring 'religious activities' as their main activity have always been and remain, the largest charity sub-type numbering over 14,000, approximately 20% of all registered charities. Closer to 30% or nearly 20,000 charities are registered with a charitable purpose of 'advancing religion'.

While the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profit Commission took over the registration of charities entitled to receive tax exemptions in 2013, the legislation administered by the ACNC was compromised in its power to hold religious charities to account as a direct result of influence from the churches. A status of Basic Religious Charity was added to the legislation which exempts religious charities from reporting to government, permitting religous charities to 'self-identify' as to their own eligibility for this status.

As asserted by Professor Ann O'Connell, who is 'Special Counsel at Allens, Solicitors, a member of the Advisory Panel to the Board of Taxation and a member of the Australian Tax Office Public Rulings Panel and GAAR Panel',

An example of how the BRC exemption (even when correctly applied) affects transparency and accountability is exemplified in some of our earliest established charities. The Anglican Church Property Trust of Sydney manages, invests and distributes assets of the Anglican Church in Australia yet is not required to provide financial statements to the ACNC.

In The Purple Economy: supernatural charities, tax and the state, Max Wallace argues that the failure of democracies to fully realise a distinction between church and state has resulted in churches becoming "immensely wealthy as a result of their centuries old tax-exempt status as charities that 'advance religion'".

Written prior to the establishment of the ACNC - and any requirement for charities to publicly disclose their finances- Wallace was reduced to searching newspapers for references to the purchase or sale of church properties.

More recent analysis using similar methodology was employed by Fairfax journalists journalists to estimate the value of properties owned by the Catholic church.

As is pointed out in the book, Wallace quotes Richard Lead that Section 23 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1932 (since superseded by the 1997 Act) exempted "religious institutions from tax of every type of income, not just donations from their parishioners. Property rents, bank interest, dividends, capital gains, trading profits - you name the income, and section 23(e) renders it free of income tax." and quotes a former Tax Commissioner's intimate awareness of just how effectively churches in particular have been able to exploit their privileged tax exemptions: "The then Tax Commissioner, Mr Carmody, was quoted as saying that the exploitation of salary-sacrifice arrangements by non-profit organisations including 'churches' had gone too far". Wallace also quotes Treasurer Peter Costello in the Canberra Times (25 August 1998):

In a speech to Anglicare in the wake of scandals in the Anglican church reminiscent of those currently bestting the Catholic Church. Peter Costello went so far as to point out that:

Treasurer Peter Costello capped fringe-benefits exemptions in 2000 but with concessions as a result of the stance taken by the Democrats who were concerned with the implications for hospitals.

Despite Treasurer Costello's attempts to put a stop to the abuse of fringe-benefits, concessions were made for Public Benevolent Institutions, leaving religious employers to continue to use fringe benefit tax exemptions to obfuscate the incomes of their employees.

The generosity of PBI tax concessions entice religious charities to register with the ACNC for the tax benefits and a lax attitude toward holding religious charities to account has seen them rort the system. However, a recent clarification of the legislation now makes charities choose between the financial benefits of tax concessions or the ability to define themselves under law as religious organisations.

For the purposes of regulation, charities must declare a charitable 'purpose' and a 'main activity'. Charities must also not have a 'disqualifying purpose':" The ACNC Act sets out the 14 subtypes with which a charity can be registered. These include the 12 charitable purposes in the Charities Act 2013 (Cth), as well as Public Benevolent Institutions and Health Promotion Charities."

In 2016, the former Charities Commissioner, Susan Pascoe handed down an Interpretation Statement for how the ACNC would administer the awarding of the status of Public Benevolent Institutions, a status which plays a key role in either extending or limiting tax exemptions to religious charities.

This Statement held that Public Benevolent Institutions could not maintain that status and the tax exemptions which flow from that if their main activity is religious activities. This Statement has two main implications for religious charities: one financial and the other legal. If religious Public Benevolent Institutions do not drop advocating religion and religious activities from their registration applications with the ACNC, they are likely to lose PBI status and the generous tax concessions which flow from that.

However this lack of acknowledgment of their religious affiliation also has legal implications:

Furthermore, in light of the legalisation of same-sex marriage, religious charities are concerned that their continued prosetylisation of the traditional view of marriage might be seen as a 'disqualifying purpose' under the Charities Act which prohibits registration of charities that pursue a purpose which is against public policy. Such concerns prompted the 2018 Ruddock Review of Freedom of Religion to make the following recommendation:

Catholic commentators hope the forthcoming religious discrimination bill is set to tip the balance back in favour of religious institutions by squaring the circle on the issues raised by same sex mariage legislation.

It appears that every time the secular state gets close to removing the privileges bestowed in an earlier age from religious charities, the churches find a way to maintain the status quo. With the religious right now so embroiled in national politics, a truly secular state looks set to remain more an ideal than a reality for Australia.

Government Reports, submissions & sites

Religious Freedom Review, 2018, Prime Minister and Cabinet, Commonwealth of Australia.

Conviction with Compassion: A Report on Freedom of Religion and Belief 2000, Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, Commonwealth of Australia.

Defining Moments: Bourke Church Act, n.d. National Museum of Australia.

Fringe Benefits Tax: Charities and Non Profit Organisations, 2000, Peter Costello, Treasury Media Release, Commonwealth of Australia.

Address to the Anglicare Lunch: Is Faith a Lost Cause, 2003, Peter Costello.

Charity Commissioners Interpretation Statement, 2016, ACNC, Commonwealth of Australia.

Tax Deductible Gift Recipient Reform Opportunities Discussion Paper, 2017, Treasury, Commonwealth of Australia.

Basic Religious Charities Under The Australian Charities and Not-For-Profit Commission Act 2012, 2019, Anne O'Connell, Review of Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) legislation, Treasury, Commonwealth of Australia.

Basic Religious Charities, n.d. ACNC, Commonwealth of Australia.

A Thematic Heritage Study on Australia's Benevolent and Other Care Institutions, 2016, Commonwealth of Australia.

Henry Tax Review,2010, Ken Henry, Treasury, Commonwealth of Australia.

Academic Articles

^The Socio-Political and Legal History of the Tax Deduction for Donations to Charities in Australia and how the 'Public Benevolent Institution' Developed, 2017 Fiona Martin Associate Professor, School of Taxation and Business Law, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Books

The purple economy: supernatural charities, tax and the state, 2007, Max Wallace, Elsternwick, Victoria. Australian National Secular Association.

The Nature of Prejudice, 1954, G W Allport, Addison-Wesley.

Media articles

Australian government proposes religious discrimination bill, 2019, The Catholic World Report.

Hillsong- Gods Millionaires: Pentecostal churches are not waiting to inherit the earth. They are taking it now, tax-free, 2005, Austalian/May 26, Adele Ferguson Business Review Weekly Magazine.

With $30b in wealth, why is the Catholic Church struggling to pay for justice?, 2018, Ben Schneiders and Royce Millar and Chris Vedelago, The Age.

Archdiocese defends compensation scheme as more money flows to victims, 2019, Farrah Tomazin, The Age.

Churches reap the benefits of belief: $500 million in tax exemptions, 2006, Barney Zwartz, The Age.

Scott Morrison urges coleagues to avoid another religious freedom row, 2019, David Crowe, SMH.

Democrats oppose new fringe benefits tax rules, 2000, PM with Mark Colvin, Radio National, ABC.

Catholic church restates staunch opposition to voluntary assisted dying laws, 2019, Melissa Cunningham, The Age.

Election FactCheck: is the Australian Sex Party right about religious organisations, tax and record-keeping?, 2016, Bronwen Dalton & Ann O'Connor, The Conversation.

Terminally ill patients in Catholic-run hospitals and hospices wanting to end their lives will have to move elsewhere to ask to use the scheme, with Church health providers reaffirming they will not offer assisted dying services. (The Age 18 June, 2019) Not all charities are eligible for ‘Deductible Gift Recipient’ (‘DGR’) status. In fact, only about 38 per cent of charities are currently DGRs. PBIs [Public Benevolent Institutions] are the largest group of charities that are eligible for DGR status. We have seen that the PBI was developed by the legislature to ensure that the tax concession of deductibility of donations was not available to all charities. There are several explanations for this, although the paramount one seems to be the protection of the revenue. The donation tax concession is estimated by Treasury to cost the Federal revenue over $1.2 billion per year. (The Adelaide Law Review, 2013) The Australian not-for-profit (NFP) sector is large and diverse. It consists of approximately 600,000 organisations across a number of different entity types. As of 17 February 2017, around 54,800 charities were registered with the ACNC. There are around 28,000 organisations endorsed as DGRs, of which around 18 per cent are not registered charities – under 10 per cent are government entities (and therefore not eligible for charity registration) and over 8 per cent could seek charity registration with the ACNC. (Treasury, 2017 ) ...studies show that churches and other non-profit organisations saved more than $1 billion each year by paying less tax or none. These [exemptions] include exemptions from the GST, income tax, fringe benefits tax at the federal level; land tax, stamp duty, payroll tax and car registration (state); and rates, and some power and water charges (local government and utilities). (The Age, 2016)
...the core business of chuches has moved from parish work [where revenue is declining] to winning and supplying government contracts [where revenue is growing] (Wallace, 2007)
Each year the ACNC has noted that religious charities had wrongly self-assessed themselves as BRCs. For example, in 2014 they identified 464 charities that were incorporated or had another sub-type (and so ineligible to be a BRC). In 2015, 354 charities were identified as being incorporated and in 2016, 371 charities were identified as having misclassified themselves as BRCs.
..the Herald-Sun of 27 August 2002 reported that,
"The Anglican Church is well and truly in the commercial property game. At least 15 of its Melbourne diocese church properties are rented out for various uses, including offices, service stations, shops and car parks. It has waterfront properties it plans to develop and multi-million dollar joint ventures on the table. It owns property worth about $1B spread across 1,100 titles in the Melbourne diocese...the church is planning four or five property developments in Melbourne...[the accounting manager] describes the projects as multi-million dollar residential and commercial developments. The diocese also has a $70M investment portfolio inlcuing $20M in 30 stocks on the share market."
...the Federal Government told the churches and charities yesterday to stop using loopholes to reduce tax for their senior staff. Many benevolent institutions were loading fringe benefits such as expensive cars into salary packages, Treasurer Peter Costello said. 'The churches can't have it both ways...they can't say on the one hand we stand for a tight tax system against avoidance but on the other we don't want any of our fringe benefits brought into the tax net'.
Less than half of the population rates clergymen highly for ethics and honesty. This is at a time when church leaders speak out on what they perceive to be moral issues...When the government was reforming the tax system I was amazed how many church leaders were, in fact, tax experts who had sized up the moral of a value added tax. (Peter Costello, 2003)
In A New Tax System (Fringe Benefits) Act 2000, the cap applying to charities and those other organisations was increased to $30,000 'of grossed up taxable value per employee with effect from 1 April 2001. This amount had been $17,000. (Treasury, 2000)
A significant trap that we see for ministries in employment law is the provision of exempt Fringe Benefits to its employees. We are regularly seeing ministry employers, such as churches and para-church organisations, providing exempt Fringe Benefits to employees in circumstances where that employee probably is not eligible for those payments. (Corey & Lind Lawyers, 2007)
When this reasoning is applied to the public benevolent arms of religious institutions, in effect, the requirements of charity law disentitle such bodies from the exemption under anti-discrimination law. This has the practical consequence that such bodies will not be able to require that their governing members or staff (the persons who effect their purposes) ascribe to, or act in accordance with, a set of religious beliefs. They thus forego discretion over the character and voice of their institutions. (Adventist Development and Relief Agency Australia Ltd, Seventh-day Adventist Aged Care, Compassion Australia and Anglicare Sydney, 2018)
Recommendation 4:
The Commonwealth should amend section 11 of the Charities Act 2013 to clarify that advocacy of a ‘traditional’ view of marriage would not, of itself, amount to a ‘disqualifying purpose’.
The legislation would also establish a religious freedom commissioner at the Australian Human Rights Commission. Moreover, it would amend existing laws regarding religious freedom, including marriage and charities law, and objects clauses in anti-discrimination law. (The Catholic World Report, 2019)